Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> they viciously protect PageRank

Made a quick search. Couldn't find a single lawsuit that Google had brought upon on a smaller or a bigger player. They protect Search technologies using Trade Secrets not Patents.

> they sued Apple with motorola patents they acquired for that specific purpose

Well technically it was still Motorola that sued Apple using it's own patents. And that was after the patent war had already consumed most of the tech media.

> get leverage to force Apple to license its patents.

Which is something that should be done! Why is it that technology that is essential for building cellphones has to be licensed (and at a pretty cheap rate) but technology that is selectively applicable like the dozens of patents including Swipe-To-Unlock, Unified Search, Pinch-To-Zoom etc are okay not to be licensed and yet be used to ban devices altogether?

> Most drugs that have been invented never would have been, and technology progress would be much, much slower.

Straw-man. Most people who are Anti-IP (I am not BTW), are against software patents NOT patents in general.



  They protect Search technologies using Trade Secrets not Patents.
There is an actual patent on PageRank: http://www.google.com/patents/US6285999 in case that statement is implying there isn't.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: