> said usage is actually getting monitored and performance appraisals have now started depending on the AI usage instead of (or at least in addition to) traditional metrics like number of priority bugs raised, code reviews, Function Points Analysis, etc.
Really? This sounds absurd. "Instead of" means it doesn't matter how shit your work is as long as you're burning tokens? Or it doesn't matter how good your work is if you're not burning tokens? Name and shame
If you admin a google-workspace domain, you get metrics out of the box on agent usage.
I guess it's great for AI companies that they've managed to bait and switch "this will improve your productivity" to "this is how much time you're sinking into this, let's not care about if that was useful"
There are a bunch of companies out there that are tracking what percentage of their developers are using LLMs now.
I heard a rumor recently that AWS are doing this, and managers are evaluated based on what percentage of their direct reports used an LLM (an Amazon-approved model) at least once over a given time period.
Really? This sounds absurd. "Instead of" means it doesn't matter how shit your work is as long as you're burning tokens? Or it doesn't matter how good your work is if you're not burning tokens? Name and shame