Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is obviously false on the face of it. Let’s say I have a patent, song, or a book that that I receive large royalty payments for. It would obviously not be logical for me be in favor of abolishing something that’s beneficial to me.

Declaring that your side has a monopoly on logic is rarely helpful.





Either by democracy (more consumers than produces), or ethically (thoughts and intellect are not property), it's logical. I guess it is not logical for someone who makes money with it today.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: