Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think it would be more effective to begin organizing a primary challenge to Nancy Pelosi. Residents of San Francisco have the unique ability to send a message to the minority leader, and therefore, the entire democratic party.

The leverage, or political return on effort, for challenging a house party leader is far greater than for any other elected official. (Senate leaders have far more constituents)



Dianne Feinstein chairs the Intelligence Committee and is complicit with all of these shenanigans. She's worse.

It's not clear how to beat the Dem machine in California (I'm a disgruntled liberal).


Unfortunately, it's a much more systemic problem than can be solved by ousting a politician here or there.

I encourage everyone who cares about this to get politically involved at a level beyond merely voting for congress critters now and then.

There's a lot that you can do, from joining and supporting organizations like the EFF and the ACLU to getting involved in local politics, which is usually the level that can be most affected by relatively small numbers of individuals.


If she were a senator from Rhode Island, I'd recommend this. But the population of California is 38 Million.

The population per congressman averages 700,000

Not to mention that, horrifyingly, she's not up for election until 2018, while congressman are elected every 2 years.

But yes, her repeated use of the word "Homeland" is disturbing.


Yes! Put your money where your mouth is and raise money to oust Pelosi. The tech community is the "moneyed interests" here. They should be able to at least give her a big scare.


The tech industry has been complicit in this, and I think how the Democrat party resonates with them can be summarized as such:

> What you can control cannot hurt you.

I think this explains why those in the tech industry either stand firmly and resolutely with the government (and firmly belonging to the Democrat party), or their political allegiance follows along Libertarian lines because such statements instill a strong sense of anxiety and trepidation.


Are you saying the democratic party controls tech or the other way around? Neither is true. The tech industry is phenomenally impotent in political issues, and neither party cares enough about tech to want to control it.

The tech industry is to the democratic party like the faithful wife who gets cheated on. Tech folks vote reliably democrat, or not at all, so there is zero reason to care about their interests.


Good idea, provided you're not saying it's an either-or.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: