Assuming the HTML is compressed, wouldn't this also achieve the same "poor-man's pipelining" result, as in less server connections? It seems to have broader browser support than the JAR thing.
Data uri's can't be cached, so they can only help latency of a cold page load, but they make every page after that slower. (if you put the data uri in your html instead of the css)
Assuming the HTML is compressed, wouldn't this also achieve the same "poor-man's pipelining" result, as in less server connections? It seems to have broader browser support than the JAR thing.
Edit: I found this too... the MHTML method linked in this article is also interesting: http://danielmclaren.net/2008/03/embedding-base64-image-data...