Did I miss where someone was arguing that Square or Box would become the next $200 billion company? I don't recall ever once seeing that argument made.
So what was the point of this article holding up those straw examples, and then referring to the business dynamics that MSFT / GOOG / FB enjoy?
For every Google, there are hundreds of small to mid size, successful technology companies.
Square doesn't need a monopoly to build a great $10 or $20 billion business in payments, and there's nothing wrong with achieving that scale vs. becoming a juggernaut like the before mentioned.
Did I miss where someone was arguing that Square or Box would become the next $200 billion company? I don't recall ever once seeing that argument made.
So what was the point of this article holding up those straw examples, and then referring to the business dynamics that MSFT / GOOG / FB enjoy?
For every Google, there are hundreds of small to mid size, successful technology companies.
Square doesn't need a monopoly to build a great $10 or $20 billion business in payments, and there's nothing wrong with achieving that scale vs. becoming a juggernaut like the before mentioned.