I feel that although the distinction can be very important, it's much less so for Javascript. And the implementation in Ramda can be used that way any time you choose:
var total = reduce(add)(0); // or
var sum = reduce(add)(0)(numbers)
works just as well in Ramda as
var total = reduce(add, 0); // or
var sum = reduce(add, 0, numbers)
So, as I said, feel free to keep on insisting. :-)
I finally got a chance to watch that video, and it looks as though what you're worried about is `flip`. Ramda for one already includes a version that works much like Haskell's. I don't know if this satisfies your objection, though.
I feel that although the distinction can be very important, it's much less so for Javascript. And the implementation in Ramda can be used that way any time you choose:
works just as well in Ramda as So, as I said, feel free to keep on insisting. :-)