Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

So what is the answer? Are we essentially rejecting the business model of "cheap appliance, recoup costs"?



How about rejecting "cheap appliance; recoup costs with shady, anticompetitive business practices"


It's inherent to the business model to block out competition on the "recoup" item. What business sells the appliance at a loss and meekly accepts being overrun by third-party suppliers? Dead businesses, that's who...


Yup, I think we should, because it leads to the world where appliances suck.


Downside: the model is "progressive", where more people can afford to use the appliance because it is subsidized by people with high usage. So if we axe that model, product X becomes inaccessible to many people.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: