it is available for reading even without the account. At least works for me.

pdkl95 · on Feb 18, 2015

Wow. They took the javascript-only, broken page stupidity even further than current fad frameworks that only serve up an empty <body> tag. This linkedin page doesn't even include a body at all:

    <html><head>
    <script type="text/javascript">...</script>
    </head></html>

toothbrush · on Feb 18, 2015

People who design such brazenly idiotic things should be promptly keelhauled.

ryan-allen · on Feb 18, 2015

The web embraces random hacks like this, it wouldn't be what it is without people doing stuff like this!

emp_zealoth · on Feb 18, 2015

Oh no! It wouldn't be a mess of glitching, flickering, sliding about "dynamic" content slots that would actually work better as a plain static website... There are webpages that cause firefox to need more RAM than AAA games Sarcasm for (I hope) sarcasm

ryan-allen · on Feb 24, 2015

Well, I agree with that in particular. I find it very unsettling when I can't scroll a website on my i7 and GTX670 at home without it stuttering around.

lucaspiller · on Feb 18, 2015

On mobile first it tries to get me to login, then tries to get me to download the app, then says I have to login to read the article :-)