No, I don't want the government to get involved. I hold the (probably far more radical position than you) that government is not entitled to secrets at all, and that all government employees should be live-streaming their activities to the public Internet at all times while on duty.
I was presenting an alternative on the assumption the government would anyway.
> We're not talking about secrets and government employees!
Actually, that is the core premise of the conversation I am having.
You probably have a reasonable point, but I'm disinclined to discuss it if we're not actually having the same conversation. All the more so since you have made a false accusation about my desires.
My example is: A sues the NYT, demanding that they rescind something.
Your solution: The government steps in and takes the action itself.
You want the government to get involved. I don't. I want A and the NYT to fight it out in court.