He brought it up because it's the perfect analogy. Guns are prolific in the United States and they are protected by their Constitution. Encryption is prolific everywhere and is also (arguably) protected.
Politicians want to ban/control both of them for their own misguided, naive reasons, and in both cases doing so is impossible.
Politicians want to ban/control both of them for their own misguided, naive reasons, and in both cases doing so is impossible.