Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

AMD's competitive mobile chips are bit different; higher TDP, higher core counts. Not ideal for a thin and light machine.


This is simply false. AMD has recently been ahead in performance/W leading to lower TDP while also being faster than Intel. Mobile AMD chips can be configured down to 10W even with 8c/16t.


I thought the 4000U series was supposed to be more efficient than Intel but still provide higher core counts?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: