2x4s are one of the only things I can think of whose entire name is just literally raw dimensions, so finding out they are not even right was a real wtf moment.
I went down the street to the 24-hour grocery. When I got there, the guy was locking the front door. I said, “Hey, the sign says you’re open 24 hours.” He said, “Yes, but not in a row.” -- Steven Wright
A couple of years ago there was an urgent care clinic near me that put up a big banner that said "Now open 24/7" and in smaller letters underneath, "Closed Sunday, Monday, and Thursday". Presumably they had a novel definition of "/7".
If you’ve ever done construction work (particularly framing obviously) you tend to realize it very quickly, but you get quite used to dealing with it; it’s all quite standardized, simple carpentry.
A lot of batteries like 18650’s or CR2032’s as examples are basically just their size in millimeters, and as far as I know, they are accurate.
Seems a bit strange it was never rebranded... We just buy structural timber by its actual dimensions (the standard here is 90x45 mm) here in Australia.
For a lot of applications, you can assume thickness, so width is usually the headline number.
Floating shelves are typically going to be a nominal inch thick, likely planed to around 20mm, so you can tell an apprentice to go and get 2m of 140mm board
I thought they were supposed to be 12 inches long but for whatever they didn't end up that way. That's slightly different than a piece of wood that's supposed to be smaller than 2x4
I ordered a quarter pounder at a McDonald's drive through, and the cashier said, "There will be a wait on that." I asked, "Oh really? How much will it weigh?" There was a long pause, and they finally said, "About 5 minutes."
“The modern-day dimensions of a 2×4 are smaller due to historical practices and practical considerations. Thinner pieces of wood were favored over time to reduce shipping costs and increase efficiency in transportation. These dimensions eventually became standardized to strike a balance between cost-efficiency and structural integrity.”
I guess keep an eye on whether they continue to get smaller over time.. the above is a nice explanation but it could just be shrinkflation.
I always figured it was due to milling to finished dimensions from raw lumber. You can buy unmilled lumber by the board-foot (basically 1”x12”x12”), and you get exact pay for dimensions, but when you’re buying finished, milled lumber the only thing that you can trust is that it’s been milled to a standard.
In other words, they start with ~2”x~4” and mill to exactly 1.5”x3.5”
Don’t ask me why that all changes at 1/2” dimensions.
As long as the lumber is a standard size then it can be accounted for. The problem is that when dimensions get too far from what you need then you have to use more lumber and/or make a lot more scrap, leading to more cost in both material and labor. A lot of things in home building are based upon standard lumber dimensions.
That said, even after building with dimensional lumber for decades, it's still weird to me that a 2x4 isn't 2x4.
I'm just getting into woodworking. This has been a consistent source of confusion. It's no simpler with rough lumber. The usable yield of 4/4 (i.e. four quarter, or a one inch thick rough piece) is at least 13/16 of an inch after surfacing two sides.
> Wood manufacturers faced a significant challenge in the late 1800s when forests near major cities were depleted, necessitating the shipping of lumber over longer distances. However, the exorbitant costs of railroad shipping, often double the price of the lumber itself, prompted manufacturers to find innovative solutions.
There was a book recommended here on HN a few months ago - Nature's Metropolis - that devotes an entire chapter to why and how, in the second half of the 1800s, shipping green lumber to Chicago lumber yards came to dominate the entire industry. Yet that changed very suddenly as the above quote points out.
The TLDR is that within an hour or so of arriving in Chicago, your load of lumber would go to auction, be bought, and you'd have cold hard cash in your pocket. To facilitate this, the Chicago yards all agreed to adopt size and quality standards like the grain elevators had. Other cities paid much more, but took days or weeks and you got a promissory note rather than cash.
But at some point the railroads started charging by weight rather than by carload, and it was worth drying your lumber before shipping. Nobody shipped to those Chicago yards after that, so someone else had to take over the standardization of dried lumber.
I live in a building built in the 40s near Chicago and I've done a lot of work that exposed various parts of the underlying structure, and the history you describe is all over the place. The dimensional lumber in the walls and floors/ceilings are widely varied and rough, not planed to anything too terribly specific. To add further injury built on sand because we're on a dune by the beach, Which as you can imagine means things are never square or plumb :-)
I recently realized that the steel beams in the ceiling of the bar (building used to be a bar/restaurant/inn) are actually old railroad ties or something. Chicago industry baby! :-D
TL;DR - 2x4 is the rough dimensions, the pieces are planed (have surface material removed) to create a smoother/finished surface on the board and the final dimensions are slightly smaller than 2x4 as a result.
